Starve.Org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .The Usenet Project

Source:

Page 253 of White Noise

Keywords:

"rightly," "shoots," "real," "trace"

From: walksalone <spamstopper@nerdshack.com>
Subject: jwexpress_0727.txt
Date: 18 May 2008
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist

>john w wrote:

>> >Could be, but Weatherly posts from Seattle and "CB"
>> >is a Comcast client in the Arlington, Texas area.
>> >There was also a bit of banter between them when
>> >Weatherly hypocritically took "CB" to ask for his unChristian
>> >behavior.

>> How was that "hypocritical?"  I suffer a behavior disorder;
>> CB does not.

>It's interesting to watch

Any "question" I "asked" was PURELY hypothetical!

As in, I frankly don't care what you think.

My conscience is clear.

john w

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: In the name of YHWH
Message-ID: <r37952t299bvner467udrc8bfuk302toui@4ax.com>
References: <HLI4g.7$j%3.1656@news.uswest.net>
<umq652pu2192m6ss35am8htuecido55c5m@4ax.com> <8NR4g.65743$F_3.17412
@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 212
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:37:11 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.108.208.45
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1146397031 207.108.208.45 (Sun, 30 Apr 2006
06:37:11 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 06:37:11 CDT
Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!postnews.google.com!news3.google.com!
newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news.vic.com!
feed.news.qwest.net!news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.religion.christian.baptist:801875

x-no-archive: yes
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:29:24 GMT, "Joe Tucker" <jtucker46@hotmail.com>
wrote:

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

>"john w @yoo.hoo>" <johnw<no_spam> wrote in message
>news:umq652pu2192m6ss35am8htuecido55c5m@4ax.com...
>> x-no-archive: yes
>> On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:13:27 GMT, Proshome <proshome@libero.it> wrote:
>> copyright 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of
>> this article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of
>> the author
>>>Who is YHWH? IMHO, the majority of Christians have been led astray
over
>>>this issue and may very well be following confusion or another
>>>"elohiym", translated from the Hebrew text and referring also to false
>>>gods. After the resurrection of Jesus, He says to Mary M. in John
>>>20:17(KJV) "Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but
go
>>>to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your
>>>Father; and to my God, and your God." This is the same God for
Abraham,
>>>Isaac, & Jacob also, and He has his own proper name of YHWH. Now, if
>>>Jesus has a God, and he too is God, how can this be considered
>>>monotheism?

>> You refer to one passage in which Jesus "has a God". You FAIL to refer
>> to the passage where Yhwh says -- of the Son-- "Thy throne, oh God--
>> shall endure forever."

>Can't find this scripture. Nowhere. Need book, chapter and verse.

That's truly interesting, since it's one of the most famous
Trinitarian passages in the entire Bible.

I suggest you add to your Bible study library half-a-dozen
translations OTHER than the NWT.  Try the Peshitta, try the LITV, try
the NASB, try the TEV.

The use of the phrase, "Thy throne, oh God", by the way, might SUGGEST
to a sincere seeker ( I doubt that you are ) that the passage would be
find able in a King James.

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

>> If Jesus (the Son) "has a God", then how do you explain that Yhwh (the
>> Father) ALSO "has a God."

>> The FACT IS, you are attempting to understand deity in human terms,
>> within human understanding.

>> Don't.

>> YOu can point to 'Jesus in all ways being submissive unto the Father."

>> And you can point to 'the Word (Son) was WITH God (the Father), and
>> the Word WAS GOD (the Father).

>Many other bible translation do not say this because it is a mis-
translation
>and out of context.

Interesting.

I have some 12 different translations, AND I have the NWT (NOT a true
translation). And the ONLY "Bible" I have that is "translated" as YOU
would like it, is the NWT.

>Verse 1 says: "In the beginning was the word".
>But god had no begining.

Nor do I understand that verse to mean what you are suggesting.

>Verse 2 says: This one was in [the] beginning with God.
>But god had no begining.

Nor do I understand that verse to mean what you are suggesting.

Nor am I at ALL convinced that you are a scholar at ANY level.

>Look at verse 18: No man has seen God at any time; the only-begotten god
who
>is in the bosom [position] with the Father is the one that has explained
>him.
>So Jesus could not be the father.

You could certainly TWIST that one verse to attempt to make it mean
what you would like it to mean.

You have YET to deal with John 1:1, other than to twist it into a
pretzel!

You also have not dealt with
Col 1, Col 2, Rev 1 or Rev 22; Rev 1 and Rev 22 call Jesus Christ "The
Alpha and Omega" (a title reserved for God)

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

>> If you look for "conflict, disharmony, and confusion", you will surely
>> find it.

>> On the other hand, if you look for harmony and Truth, you will also
>> find that.

>> Consider Col 2.  "For in Him (Christ), dwelt ALL THE FULLNESS OF THE
>> GODHEAD (Father/Son/Holy Spirit) in flesh."

>>  That is, Jesus the Christ was ALL that DEITY could be IN HUMAN FORM.

>Colossians 2:9:

>KJ reads: In him [Christ] dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead
[Greek,
>the·o´te·tos] bodily. (A similar thought is conveyed by the renderings
in
>NE, RS, JB, NAB, Dy.) However, NW reads: It is in him that all the
fullness
>of the divine quality dwells bodily. (AT, We, and CKW read God's nature,
>instead of Godhead. Compare 2 Peter 1:4.)

You are wasting your time, if you are seeking to convince me that
Jesus was a creation and not The Creator. John 1 says that Jesus
Christ created everything that was created. Since Genesis 1 says that
the FATHER created everything, if we align Gen 1 with John 1, it is
clear that Jesus Christ was/ is the Father in human form.

>Admittedly, not everyone offers the same interpretation of Colossians

2:9.

Good! Then at LEAST you admit that there are those (MANY scholars) who
take Colossians 2:9 to mean PRECISELY as I stated: Christ was Father,
Son, and Holy Spirit in flesh.

>But what is in agreement with the rest of the inspired letter to the
>Colossians? Did Christ have in himself something that is his because he
is
>God, part of a Trinity?

Precisely.

The PROOF is that if we take each "person" separately, we can study
from Genesis to Revelation (called "systematic theology", a concept
totally FOREIGN to Jehovah's Witnesses), and we find from Genesis to
Revelation that there is One called God the Father. He is Omniscient;
He is Omnipotent; and He is Omnipresent.  We next look for the Holy
Spirit, from Genesis through Revelation, and we find HE is He is
Omniscient; He is Omnipotent; and He is Omnipresent.

Now, since we KNOW that ONLY God is
Omnipotent

and ONLY God is Omniscient

THEN, if we can show that
the Father is Omnipotent, He is God.

If we can show that the Son is Omnipotent, He is God.

If we can show that the Holy Spirit is Omnipotent, He is God.

That is, if each of these "persons" expresses ANY of these qualities
of Deity, that "person" is God.

We find the Father is Omniscient, He is Omnipotent, and He is
Omnipresent. the Holy Spirit is as well.  The Son is Omnipotent, and
He is Omniscient.

Therefore, there are THREE who are God. We call them "The Holy
Trinity."

end of discussion.

Or is the fullness that dwells in him something that

>became his because of the decision of someone else? Colossians 1:19 (KJ,
Dy)
>says that all fullness dwelt in Christ because it pleased the Father for
>this to be the case. NE says it was by God's own choice.

One passage may say that; not all do. And one of the rules I learned
MANY years ago is, "Do not of ONE VERSE a proof text make."

You are seeking a verse here, and you are seeking a verse there, that
seem to say what you WANT to believe.

If we do that, then the first chapter of Ecclesiastes says, "All is
vain!"

All is NOT vain, but you may want to use that as a proof text for
SOMETHING!

That is NOT honest exegesis!

>Consider the immediate context of Colossians 2:9:

No!

 YOu can manipulate and you can twist all you like.

There is PLENTY of evidence for the Trinity.

And if ANYTHING I said led you to believe I am open to being
recruited...

I am not.

john w

snip

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!news.glorb.com!mpls-transit-
01.news.qwest.net!207.225.159.1.MISMATCH!feed.news.qwest.net!
news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
Newsgroups:
free.christians,alt.bible,alt.christnet.public,alt.religion.christian.bap
tist,alt.christnet.evangelical
Subject: Re: Is "CB" Actually John Weatherly?
Message-ID: <bl6952pgbcimj4igqsifccm7qvqtbe34m9@4ax.com>
References: <1146368493.739820.102720@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<1146369174.011738.72420@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<1146369420.597757.321720@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 32
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:09:16 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.108.208.45
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1146395357 207.108.208.45 (Sun, 30 Apr 2006
06:09:17 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 06:09:17 CDT
Xref: uni-berlin.de free.christians:37851 alt.bible:1009222
alt.christnet.public:70019 alt.religion.christian.baptist:801874
alt.christnet.evangelical:131649

x-no-archive: yes
On 29 Apr 2006 20:57:00 -0700, "Kelly A. Siebecke"

<hisown12@theriver.com> wrote:

 copyright 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of
this article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of
the author

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

>Dave wrote:
>> Kelly A. Siebecke wrote:
>> > Let's take a look at the possibility that John Weatherly
>> > (johnw) is recently posing as "CB" in these forums.

>> Could be, but Weatherly posts from Seattle and "CB" is a Comcast
client
>> in the Arlington, Texas area.  There was also a bit of banter between
>> them when Weatherly hypocritically took "CB" to ask for his
unChristian
>> behavior.

>Ahh...

>Well, maybe they were separated at birth?

I have a suggestion for you, Kelly; if you don't wish to be insulted,
don't insult.

I have left you alone for probably a WEEK now.

Don't give me cause to jump back on your back.

john w

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!postnews.google.com!news3.google.com!
news.glorb.com!mpls-transit-01.news.qwest.net!207.225.159.1.MISMATCH!
feed.news.qwest.net!news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
Newsgroups:
free.christians,alt.bible,alt.christnet.public,alt.religion.christian.bap
tist,alt.christnet.evangelical
Subject: Re: Is "CB" Actually John Weatherly?
Message-ID: <6h6952l3sssvk4rma0bhtcj0if9l4fel5k@4ax.com>
References: <1146368493.739820.102720@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<1146369174.011738.72420@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 34
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:08:12 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.108.208.45
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1146395293 207.108.208.45 (Sun, 30 Apr 2006
06:08:13 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 06:08:13 CDT
Xref: uni-berlin.de free.christians:37850 alt.bible:1009221
alt.christnet.public:70018 alt.religion.christian.baptist:801873
alt.christnet.evangelical:131648

x-no-archive: yes
On 29 Apr 2006 20:52:54 -0700, "Dave" <horndw@gmail.com> wrote:
 copyright 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of
this article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of
the author

>Kelly A. Siebecke wrote:
>> Let's take a look at the possibility that John Weatherly
>> (johnw) is recently posing as "CB" in these forums.

>Could be, but Weatherly posts from Seattle and "CB" is a Comcast client
>in the Arlington, Texas area.  There was also a bit of banter between
>them when Weatherly hypocritically took "CB" to ask for his unChristian
>behavior.

How was that "hypocritical?"  I suffer a behavior disorder; CB does
not.

For you to say that my behavior is "unChristian", is like you saying
that someone with Tourette's is misbehaving, or the person with
Cerebral Palsy should "REALLY get control of himself!"

We each do the best we can with what we have.

Do YOU?

Before you judge someone, walk a mile in that person's shoes!

There IS a reason for such "old sayings."

john w

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!mpls-transit-01.news.qwest.net!
207.225.159.1.MISMATCH!feed.news.qwest.net!news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-
for-mail
From: john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
Newsgroups:
free.christians,alt.bible,alt.christnet.public,alt.religion.christian.bap
tist,alt.christnet.evangelical
Subject: Re: Is "CB" Actually John Weatherly?
Message-ID: <5t5952lp8np1qdrv2ut2jdm2el7f6k55s8@4ax.com>
References: <1146368493.739820.102720@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 103
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:05:56 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.108.208.45
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1146395157 207.108.208.45 (Sun, 30 Apr 2006
06:05:57 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 06:05:57 CDT
Xref: uni-berlin.de free.christians:37849 alt.bible:1009220
alt.christnet.public:70017 alt.religion.christian.baptist:801872
alt.christnet.evangelical:131647

x-no-archive: yes
On 29 Apr 2006 20:41:33 -0700, "Kelly A. Siebecke"

<hisown12@theriver.com> wrote:
>Let's take a look at the possibility that John Weatherly (johnw) is
>recently posing as "CB" in these forums.

First of all, if you looked back far enough in the Google archives at
the MENTION of both names (in the archived posts of OTHER posters),
you MIGHT just find that I (john w), have been posting for roughly a
year or two LONGER than CB. You MIGHT POSSIBLY ALSO notice that
neither of us even CLAIMS to be Southern Baptist, though I seem to
recall that CB claims a Southern Baptist BACKGROUND, which I also
claim.

Further investigation MIGHT ALSO lead you to posts in which CB (much
like Jim Agar) rips into virtually every proclaiming Christian in the
group. His one-liners are infamous.

CB seems to LIVE for the put-down. Whereas, I (john w), WILL be civil
and even FRIENDLY with those who are civil and friendly with me.

(try it)

And while I will not say I will tolerate your lifestyle, I will be as
nice to YOU as you will allow me to be.

What I will NOT do is to pretend everything's "hunky-dory", while you
claim to be a "committed, Spirit-filled" "homosexual Christian."

>Both are Southern Baptists,

No. I am not. I WAS for the first 40 or so years of my life a BAPTIST.
I no longer claim that label. I left the Southern Baptists in my 30s,
IIRC.

both make sure their posts are not archived

>and 86'd after a week,

I do. I don't recall seeing any x-no-archives on CB's posts. But then,
I pay CB and his posts little/no attention.

both keep trying to push Romans 1 at me,

OTC, I "push" NOTHING at you.  You say you are a Christian. I point to
Romans 1.

Just as someone might say to YOU, "I am a adulterer, and a Christian."
And you might reply with a passage from the epistles that no one can
OPENLY cheat on their spouse and be born again.

both

>use similar syntax and phrasing,

Perhaps indicating a similar level of education, or perhaps that we're
from the same region of the country.

both act like jerks.

You have the right to your POV. As do I.

  And even more

>conspicuously, when johnw posts CB rarely does (and vice-versa).

I simply don't bother with CB, as he seems to simply be seeking
attention, the syndrome known as "being an attention whore."

>Lately, a few regulars have been chasing johnw around the groups

Actually, this has been going on for YEARS.

and

>seem to post contrarily to him wherever he goes - is it possible that
>he is avoiding their wrath by posing as another person?

Could be.

But no, I don't hide from anyone.

>I think this is a distinct possibility

chuckle.

and would like to hear what

>anyone else thinks.

>Of course, if either Weatherly or CB refute this claim it would be
>expected - but MY expectation is that they provide some proof that this
>claim is invalid.

Why bother?

If you are comfortable with such delusions...  

>We shall see...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!news.glorb.com!mpls-transit-
01.news.qwest.net!207.225.159.1.MISMATCH!feed.news.qwest.net!
news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: Ping Elaine
Message-ID: <avv85258rv1rfp5e3qcb8mcpgchpo7f4pv@4ax.com>
References: <h6mdnfTXia0dZc3ZnZ2dnUVZ_tSdnZ2d@comcast.com>
<1l02525sqbkiftofrst3i3l4n3fcskcg3s@4ax.com> <4bcn2iF10cc6kU2
@individual.net> <1146189864.767623.155800@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
<Nc2dncS2ZaENDMzZnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@comcast.com> <1146219129.162329.191270
@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <h2t352pqlk3ap60hrlg6svutourn794ofs@
4ax.com> <1146230964.676067.197840@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<aee55298nv29jkc1kfg5u2jar48bc63bcj@4ax.com>
<9el6529dicje1es154fju3tsrej1b7qqa5@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 113
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 02:20:43 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.108.208.45
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1146388843 207.108.208.45 (Sun, 30 Apr 2006
04:20:43 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:20:43 CDT
Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.religion.christian.baptist:801866

x-no-archive: yes

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 08:06:45 -0400, NOspam@no.spam wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 23:06:04 -0700, john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
>wrote:

>>On the contrary, I believe that we ARE responsible as citizens to
>>protect the public from the sociopaths.  Give you a few examples of
>>what I am talking about.
>>Charlie Manson is a sociopath, and a stone-cold blooded killer.
>>Adolph Hitler was a sociopath
>>The mass murderers (Son of Sam, Green River Killer, the Marquis De
>>Sade, this creep they just arrested who murdered an entire FAMILY so
>>he could molest the youngest daughter unimpeded)

>>all sociopaths, just like Jim Agar, like walksalone, like Elaine, like
>>Phar Lap.

>Again, O feeble-minded sloth:

>YOU ARE NOT CAPABLE OR AUTHORIZED, LET ALONE QUALIFIED TO DIAGNOSE
>ANYONE.

>>And the RESPONSIBLE Christian makes sure they are removed from
>>society.

>BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA!!!You call yourself 'responsible'?
>Fine -- then be prepared to be held accountable, LIAR LEGION JOHNNIE
>DD WEATHERLESS!

>>Which I plan to do.
>>(nor do you need to know how)

>Oh, right- that great big magic conspiracy against all your
>enemies!!!!!!
>How many years has it been since your big talk of beating the hell out
>of one while imprisoning another started?
>What have you accomplished?
>How many more enemies have you made with your lies, bragging, and
>senseless threats?

>You need to sit down and do

The ONLY person whose well being you need worry about is YOURS.

And you can't even control YOUR behavior,

psycho!

And I have noticed something VERY interesting, kind of "your patter",
if you will. The angrier you get, the longer the list of ugly names
you call me.

hehe

;-)

(and you thought I hadn't noticed)

chuckle.

john w

some serious thinking, old boy------

Well, thanks, darlin'!  You have in this very post ADMITTED that I
have enough intelligence and reason to CONSIDER my behavior.

I have that much over you.  You are stuck in visceral REACTING.

Your reasoning has turned itself off.

I'm

>almost willing to place wagers that if you dared even TRY taking
>anyone to court, the rest of us would counter and you'd find yourself
>in one sopping, sorry mess.

What makes you think you have ANY allies, dearest?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm?

I doubt SERIOUSLY if these psychotic wimps and weirdos, Phar Lap, Jim
Agar, Robib, etc., would help you hail a taxi!

>Now go back to bed and take your morning pills.

If you don't like being told what to do, what makes you think anyone
else likes it?

>Then, get off your duff and go get a job, even if it's at the local
>coffee shop.

What makes you think I'm not working?

 You obviously need something else to do instead of

>harassing innocent people in these newsgroups.

Afraid I'm stealing your primary form of entertainment?

(if YOU can "harass innocent people", why can't I?)

Control FREAK!

john w

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!mpls-transit-01.news.qwest.net!
207.225.159.1.MISMATCH!feed.news.qwest.net!news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-
for-mail
From: john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: Ping Elaine
Message-ID: <ja09521hh9pdd901ipg4kae13om5isb2b9@4ax.com>
References: <1l02525sqbkiftofrst3i3l4n3fcskcg3s@4ax.com> <4bcn2iF10cc6kU2
@individual.net> <1146189864.767623.155800@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
<Nc2dncS2ZaENDMzZnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@comcast.com> <1146219129.162329.191270
@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <h2t352pqlk3ap60hrlg6svutourn794ofs@
4ax.com> <1146230964.676067.197840@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<aee55298nv29jkc1kfg5u2jar48bc63bcj@4ax.com>
<9el6529dicje1es154fju3tsrej1b7qqa5@4ax.com> <4bhh5iF11mijiU1
@individual.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 24
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 02:20:43 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.108.208.45
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1146388844 207.108.208.45 (Sun, 30 Apr 2006
04:20:44 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:20:44 CDT
Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.religion.christian.baptist:801867

x-no-archive: yes
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:57:48 -0400, "Scout Lady"

<scoutlady@nospam.net> wrote:

 copyright 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of
this article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of
the author

><NOspam@no.spam> wrote in message
>news:9el6529dicje1es154fju3tsrej1b7qqa5@4ax.com...

>> You need to sit down and do some serious thinking, old boy------ I'm
>> almost willing to place wagers that if you dared even TRY taking
>> anyone to court, the rest of us would counter and you'd find yourself
>> in one sopping, sorry mess.

>I wouldn't bet the farm Elaine especially if the person that he decided
to
>sue was you. Nevertheless, I would be more than willing to testify as to
>your character or rather lackthereof any time.

I wouldn't have asked, Cathy; but since you offered, you're on!

john w

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!newshub.sdsu.edu!pln-e!lotsanews.com!
feed.news.qwest.net!news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: Ping Elaine
Message-ID: <66e852pejcmvpbs38q6ceq0629mo0reqkn@4ax.com>
References: <1l02525sqbkiftofrst3i3l4n3fcskcg3s@4ax.com> <4bcn2iF10cc6kU2
@individual.net> <1146189864.767623.155800@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
<Nc2dncS2ZaENDMzZnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@comcast.com> <1146219129.162329.191270
@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <h2t352pqlk3ap60hrlg6svutourn794ofs@
4ax.com> <1146230964.676067.197840@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<aee55298nv29jkc1kfg5u2jar48bc63bcj@4ax.com> <1146318635.956050.90170
@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 220
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 02:16:27 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.108.208.45
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1146388588 207.108.208.45 (Sun, 30 Apr 2006
04:16:28 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:16:28 CDT
Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.religion.christian.baptist:801865

x-no-archive: yes
On 29 Apr 2006 06:50:36 -0700, "JohnH" <johnhennekes@yahoo.com> wrote:
 copyright 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of
this article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of
the author

>john w wrote:
>> x-no-archive: yes
>> On 28 Apr 2006 06:29:25 -0700, "JohnH" <johnhennekes@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>  copyright 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of
>> this article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of
>> the author

>> >john w wrote:
>> >> x-no-archive: yes
>> >> On 28 Apr 2006 03:12:09 -0700, "JohnH" <johnhennekes@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>> >>  copyright 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of
>> >> this article may be used elsewhere without express written consent
of
>> >> the author
>> >> >ujb wrote:
>> >> >> JohnH wrote:
>> >> >> > Scout Lady wrote:
>> >> >> >> <NOspam@no.spam> wrote in message
>> >> >> >> news:1l02525sqbkiftofrst3i3l4n3fcskcg3s@4ax.com...
>> >> >> >>> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:59:47 -0400, ujb <ujb@bigfeet.org>
wrote:

>> >> >> >>>> john w <johnw wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>> x-no-archive: yes
>> >> >> >>>>> On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:26:25 -0400, NOspam@no.spam wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>> On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 17:08:34 -0700, john w <johnw
<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
>> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:

>> >> >> >>>>>>> If you got that misinformation from my posts, then your
perceptions
>> >> >> >>>>>>> are as distorted as are Elaine's, if that were possible.

>> >> >> >>>>>> Yes indeed, liar johnnie ----------  EVERYONE ELSE is out
of step
>> >> >> >>>>>> except you, right?

>> >> >> >>>>>> ALL PART OF YOUR PATTERN.
>> >> >> >>>>> Elaine, you are not qualified to detect behavior
"patterns."
>> >> >> >>>> Sweet sweet told of the pattern. Remember Don* also said,
>> >> >> >>>> "watch the pattern".

>> >> >> >>> Yes indeed, Sweet-sweet--- Don did indeed- and so many of us
SEE
>> >> >> >>> 'brother weatherless' being true to his pattern every day!
>> >> >> >> IIRC Don also told us that you follow the pattern of someone
with obsessive
>> >> >> >> compulsive disorder Elaine and many of us see the truth of
that on a daily
>> >> >> >> basis just watching you follow the same pattern over and over
and over.

>> >> >> > Of course, Elaine isn't the only one obsessive-compulsive when
it comes
>> >> >> > to John Weatherly.  I see more than just a few in here who
have also
>> >> >> > developed that pattern.  You, on the other hand, have remained
pretty
>> >> >> > even-handed with him, encouraging when appropriate and
rebuking when
>> >> >> > necessary, and I can appreciate that.  I would hope that there
will
>> >> >> > come a time when others will also realize that rebuking and
arguing,
>> >> >> > after a certain point, is just plain useless.

>> >> >> It's really up to the 'scrambled one' to get real help. He's
starting to act so
>> >> >> stupid it nice you are taking pity and coming to his rescue!
Yes, it's very
>> >> >> praiseworthy how you seeing the retard can't handle the stress
of combat with
>> >> >> two girls try taking some of the pressure off him and on to
yourself. Sweet
>> >> >> sweet hadn't seen johnny starting to lose it so big time with
his infantile
>> >> >> come backs until you made it apparent. I know I'm now ready to
come to his aid
>> >> >> (again) if he'd but acknowledge the truth he's been out gunned
going against
>> >> >> his sweet sweet ujb.

>> >> >> Again it's nice seeing you take the retards little hand and
helping him to the
>> >> >> restroom for a change of nappies so to say.

>> >> >What I've done is scriptural.

>> >> >"Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and
>> >> >offenses contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid
>> >> >them."

>> >> >"Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus
Christ,
>> >> >that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh
disorderly,
>> >> >and not after the tradition which he received of us."

>> >> >I can understand why unbelievers would think like you've outlined,
but
>> >> >I did see one post of yours in which you professed to be a
believer.
>> >> >Since you obviously feel this way about those unruly, then why
haven't
>> >> >you used Romans 16:17 and 2 Thess. 3:6 as examples to simply avoid
>> >> >troublemakers and to withdraw from the disorderly?  On the other
hand,
>> >> >if you use the scriptures that gives us the authority to continue
to
>> >> >rebuke them, then you would still have to reconcile why about 80%
of
>> >> >your rebukes omit compassion and love, but shoots up to about 99%
when
>> >> >it comes to dealing with John Weatherly (and with those who
strongly
>> >> >disagree with your tact.)

>> >> Why haven't you yet addressed Jim Agar as someone who very
OBVIOUSLY
>> >> suffers a SEVERE mental disorder?

>> >> I believe it is called "being a sociopath."

>> >Doesn't really matter what it's called, but regarding your question,
>> >because the Bible gives better advice, such as is contained in Romans
>> >16:17 and 2 Thess. 3:6; specifically, to avoid troublemakers and to
>> >withdraw from the disorderly.  However, in having to sometimes deal
>> >with difficult people in here, we should still let our words reflect
>> >love and compassion.

>> On the contrary, I believe that we ARE responsible as citizens to
>> protect the public from the sociopaths.  Give you a few examples of
>> what I am talking about.
>> Charlie Manson is a sociopath, and a stone-cold blooded killer.
>> Adolph Hitler was a sociopath
>> The mass murderers (Son of Sam, Green River Killer, the Marquis De
>> Sade, this creep they just arrested who murdered an entire FAMILY so
>> he could molest the youngest daughter unimpeded)

>> all sociopaths, just like Jim Agar, like walksalone, like Elaine, like
>> Phar Lap.

>> And the RESPONSIBLE Christian makes sure they are removed from
>> society.

>> Which I plan to do.
>> (nor do you need to know how)

>> >[And before anyone else tries to misspell "hypocrite" as "hennekes,"
it
>> >does not excuse their own hypocrisy.  At least I seem to understand
the
>> >concept: "Enough is enough."]

>> >> And if he IS a military commander, do you believe for one second
that
>> >> he'd want his commanders to see how he behaves in here (where he is
>> >> certain none of them would THINK of peeking?)

>> >But "if" is the keyword.  I really don't think he's in the military,
>> >John.

>> Are you truly willing to do NOTHING and just ASSUME?

>> I am not.

>> do you know that Terry Nichols, the guy who helped Tim McVeigh PLAN
>> the bombing in Oklahoma City (didn't kill anyone, but KNEW what Tim
>> was PLANNING) is serving life, for KNOWING but DOING NOTHING about it.

>> How many mass murderers will YOU not take seriously?

>>  In fact, I don't believe that anyone that childish and that
>> >immature could have ever come out of the military, much less having
>> >even "cut it" in the military.  I could be wrong, but I'll stand
behind
>> >my gut-instinct on this one.

>> Then I'm sorry for you.

>>  I believe your judgment is WAY off, and should little Jimmy Agar or
>> Elaine Matthews one day SNAP and take 100 people with them, I wonder
>> how you'll feel then.

>> For all you've said, you are not a responsible adult.

>I disagree.  Your arguments are based upon secular beliefs, whereas
>mine are grounded in Scripture.

And we are right back to you attempting to PUSH YOUR VIEW of scripture
and what it means.

I disagree with your view of scripture, and I THOUGHT I had made that
QUITE clear 5 years ago.

  You have not presented anything

>scriptural to nullify the biblical instructions that we are clearly
>told to avoid troublemakers and to withdraw from the disorderly.

You have not presented anything scriptural to nullify the Biblical
instructions that we are CLEARLY responsible to obey the laws of our
government.

And if I know someone is DANGEROUS, and I don't turn them in to the
authorities, by both Canadian law AND US law, I am complicit.

Your "interpretation" is convenient, and since you PRETEND to be
"responsible", I will be VERY interested in how YOU are treated
legally when all this comes to a head.

  And

>even were you to now bolster all of your arguments with scriptures,

I did. And I have.

it

>will still not change the fact that the Bible has also said that this
>is not the day to separate the wheat from the tares,

In other words, if tomorrow, Elaine or walks or Jim Agar or Phar Lap
goes on a killing spree, and murders 100 people, YOU would OPPOSE
their arrest, incarceration, and prosecution, since "it is not yet the
time to separate the wheat from the tares."

nor will it change

>the biblical fact that it is God Who makes the sun to rise upon both
>the evil and the good, and the rain to fall upon both the just and the
>unjust.

Which makes you -- once again, JohnH -- part of the PROBLEM, not part
of the solution.

Jesus didn't tell us to hide in our closets til He returned; He told
us to occupy.

>Have a good day, John.

Thanks.

john w

>JohnH

>> john w

>> >> john w

>> >> >> ujb

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: Ping Elaine
Message-ID: <nlv852hjamavlaeq04f5gkpetro0nk70c5@4ax.com>
References: <4bcn2iF10cc6kU2@individual.net>   <1146189864.767623.155800
@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>  
<Nc2dncS2ZaENDMzZnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@comcast.com>  
<1146219129.162329.191270@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>  
<h2t352pqlk3ap60hrlg6svutourn794ofs@4ax.com>   <1146230964.676067.197840
@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>   <4fudnVr8r8Rdvs_ZRVn-tg@comcast.com>
<1146323214.671560.271100@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>
<OrqdnaUpKvJJCM7ZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 83
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 02:10:52 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.108.208.45
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1146388253 207.108.208.45 (Sun, 30 Apr 2006
04:10:53 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:10:53 CDT
Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!postnews.google.com!news4.google.com!
newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news.vic.com!
feed.news.qwest.net!news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.religion.christian.baptist:801862

x-no-archive: yes

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:35:35 -0400, ujb <ujb@bigfeet.org> wrote:
>JohnH wrote:
>> ujb wrote:
>>> JohnH wrote:
>> <SNIP>
>>> You're the hennekes/hypocrite because you say one should do what you
can't
>>> yourself do! Sweet sweet hasn't given out any counsel not followed.

>> Actually, you had clearly indicted yourself the hypocrite in the
thread
>> where you were completely blind to Scout Lady's point to Rod that what
>> John does to Elaine is no different than what Elaine does to John.  In
>> fact, her point to Rod had also applied to you.  

>So say Hennekes, but it wasn't addressed to sweet sweet so I didn't have
need
>to even contemplating self applying her points.

>> All what you've
>> managed to prove here is that you have 20-20 when it comes to seeing
>> the "hypocrite" in others, but totally sightless when it comes to
>> seeing your own hypocrisy.  

>Is that mountain stream crystal clear to you!

>> Besides, your own hypocrisy is not any
>> better than mine.

>Sweet sweet isn't the one railing about hypocrisy. It is our own little
>resident busybody who keeps pointing it out in others, I only followed
your
>thread with the best answers to your questions.

You don't mind if I archive and print some of your insane rants to
JohnH, do you, "Sweet sweet?"

I am sure your commander will find it VERY entertaining that you refer
to yourself in the 3rd person (a symptom of schizophrenia, by the
way).

*******************  archived **************

(in other words, I'm not the only person who you show your psychotic
side to.)

j

>>>>> And if he IS a military commander, do you believe for one second
that
>>>>> he'd want his commanders to see how he behaves in here (where he is
>>>>> certain none of them would THINK of peeking?)

>>>> But "if" is the keyword.  I really don't think he's in the military,

>>> That's the retards story, sweet sweet is just ujb without any
pretense.

>> Maybe about you being in the military, anyway.  The rest is pure
>> crappola.

>"The rest"? Did sweet sweet overlook parts of your ramble?

>>>>  In fact, I don't believe that anyone that childish and that
>>>> immature could have ever come out of the military, much less having
>>>> even "cut it" in the military. I could be wrong, but I'll stand
behind
>>>> my gut-instinct on this one.
>>> ;) just,

>> <SNIP>
>>> ps how's the dustin' coming big boy?

>> As I've indicated more than once, lil' girl-boy,

>You are so ez, you say it's improper for sweet sweet to bestow
descriptive nick
>names yet you do so yourself! Correct ujb if I wrong, but isn't that
hypocrisy?
>Doesn't that make you the hypocrite?

> > I will deal with you on my terms, not yours.

>You might be right, but because Scout Lady shows an astuteness in such
matters
>you might wish to check with her? Even the 'scrambled one' seems to be
more
>discerning, and he is handicapped.
>ujb

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!mpls-transit-01.news.qwest.net!
207.225.159.1.MISMATCH!feed.news.qwest.net!news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-
for-mail
From: john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: Ping Elaine
Message-ID: <d3v852l7s310g14ci2942edel8ratndj61@4ax.com>
References: <5q3052t7qb5j1vmj3ho6so6ufk7fagp0nk@4ax.com>
<0gi0525gesi7f8rsvlckr3rq0h5f1jkl19@4ax.com>
<h6mdnfTXia0dZc3ZnZ2dnUVZ_tSdnZ2d@comcast.com>
<1l02525sqbkiftofrst3i3l4n3fcskcg3s@4ax.com> <4bcn2iF10cc6kU2
@individual.net> <1146189864.767623.155800@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
<47n352h5s3l6kcllnvd8ulruiqq0p4i579@4ax.com>
<6d5452t6mt70rmjra7h0jrs355ktvb1apc@4ax.com>
<h906525ei6pvlata99tucvffq7e1ukk4ua@4ax.com>
<iol6529bh7mn60nfqgld1sh5r1pkfc38mc@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 97
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 02:06:57 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.108.208.45
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1146388018 207.108.208.45 (Sun, 30 Apr 2006
04:06:58 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:06:58 CDT
Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.religion.christian.baptist:801860

x-no-archive: yes

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 08:09:35 -0400, NOspam@no.spam wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 23:12:25 -0700, john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
>wrote:

>>That's not a "label", Elaine. THat is an HONEST assessment of your
>>PATHOLOGICAL misbehavior.

>AGAIN, you ARE NOT QUALIFIED TO DIAGNOSE ANYONE.

You feel free to diagnose, Elaine. If YOU can do it, I can do it.

>You still require PROPER DIAGNOSIS yourself.

AGAIN, you are not qualified to make that remark.

AGAIN, if YOU can do it, I can do it.

The difference between us, Elaine, is that I am being honest, (and as
YOU have said, I am totally within my rights to say that my HONEST
OPINION Of you is that you are absolutely PSYCHOTIC).

If YOU can make remarks about MY mental health, I can do the same to
you.

I GUARANTEE you, I have had more psychological and psychiatric
training than YOU have!

>>Your ongoing lies, your ongoing libel, and your ongoing plagiarisms,
>>and your ongoing OPEN ridicule (as if that would bother me; tsk tsk)

>Libel, no-

libel, yes. When you say that I have been misdiagnosed (like you did
above), and that I need a PROPER assessment (like you did above), that
is called "libel.'

plagiarism, no-

And when you quote me without permission, and without attaching my
name to my quote, "plagiarism". In other words, you are a THIEF.

you are dead wrong on both counts.

Well, we will let a judge decide!

>>I believe "psycho" suits you.

>AGAIN, you ARE NOT QUALIFIED TO DIAGNOSE ANYONE.

I am at LEAST as qualified as you.
Nor is "Psychotic" a diagnosis.

And when I show the right people that you have made that MISTAKE a
hundred times, your license will be pulled so fast your head will
rotate 50 times.

>>You are psychotic, and it is one of my goals to prove that.

>AGAIN, you ARE NOT QUALIFIED TO DIAGNOSE ANYONE.

YOU certainly are not, yet you say OFTEN that I need a "proper
assessment", yet YOU refuse to get one AT ALL!
(You're afraid that if you went in for an assessment, they'd keep you)

I am at LEAST as qualified as you.
Nor is "Psychotic" a diagnosis.

And when I show the right people that you have made that MISTAKE a
hundred times, your license will be pulled so fast your head will
rotate 50 times.

>But by all means, continue to be the stubborn ass you are, and try-

****************************  vulgarity alert !  **********

And, Elaine, you are the LAST person to call anyone a "stubborn ass."

You again are projecting.

;-)

My psycho friend!

>all you'll succeed in doing is showing yourself up for what you are!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!news.glorb.com!mpls-transit-
01.news.qwest.net!207.225.159.1.MISMATCH!feed.news.qwest.net!
news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.christian.roman-
catholic,free.christians
Subject: Re: The Paradox of Tertullian
Message-ID: <fvc852998b6klobr3udr35k9lmunkl5ji7@4ax.com>
References: <k5h3525jpqo6a6tnq82f24g8nma28biiej@4ax.com>  
<4be2umF1113k7U1@individual.net>  <jpn4g.948374$xm3.110511@attbi_s21>  
<qn4452d1lcetns1eqc0le5q1h1q9fsiggq@4ax.com>  <44521f73$1$jnyxfnybar
$mr2ice@news.individual.net>  <1146233997.039578.197590
@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>  <8785521dvjn67ju014hc6tf7nk2e2giccd@
4ax.com>  <4452a99b$2$jnyxfnybar$mr2ice@news.individual.net>  
<4bfv0tFvl0ccU1@individual.net> <445336bc$2$jnyxfnybar
$mr2ice@news.individual.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 44
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:51:19 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.56.80.235
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1146369079 70.56.80.235 (Sat, 29 Apr 2006
22:51:19 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:51:19 CDT
Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.religion.christian.baptist:801814
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic:1242694 free.christians:37839

x-no-archive: yes
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 04:49:48 -0500,

walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.dirt.cheap.llc wrote:

 copyright 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of
this article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of
the author

>In <4bfv0tFvl0ccU1@individual.net>, on 04/28/06
>   at 09:49 PM, "Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> said:

>><walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.dirt.cheap.llc>

>>snip

>>> You make the claim, yet there are those with more reason to act like
you
>>> do, that don't. Your claimed bi-polar, doesn't fit your conduct here.
As
>>> to the sexual abuse claim, I give it the same credit I gave your
claim to
>>> having gotten laid at the age of four. But when you finally tried to
>>> defend your story, you acted as if it was a rape by an older woman,
what
>>> was she again, 5?

>>WHAT?!?!?  Oh my, this is one I haven't heard.  Deary me, sounds
sordid.

>Sure you have, you even asked him if she orgasamd. That was the original
>claim, & the rest of the story was just a typical jw attempt to glorify
>himself.

>walksalone who doubts jw expected people to actually notice, let alone
>recall, its various outright lies.

When the time comes-- in court-- I will happily give the judge her
name. And then you can ask HER if it happened. I will give you her
FIRST name. It was "Carol."  Her initials were "CAR".

john w

 Still, lies by implication are not that

>obvious, but they are still lies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!news.glorb.com!mpls-transit-
01.news.qwest.net!207.225.159.1.MISMATCH!feed.news.qwest.net!
news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: Ping Elaine
Message-ID: <t1e852htu5felk8cbo4q6hmh8co4d2iuq8@4ax.com>
References: <h6mdnfTXia0dZc3ZnZ2dnUVZ_tSdnZ2d@comcast.com>
<1l02525sqbkiftofrst3i3l4n3fcskcg3s@4ax.com> <4bcn2iF10cc6kU2
@individual.net> <1146189864.767623.155800@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
<Nc2dncS2ZaENDMzZnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@comcast.com> <1146219129.162329.191270
@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <h2t352pqlk3ap60hrlg6svutourn794ofs@
4ax.com> <1146230964.676067.197840@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<aee55298nv29jkc1kfg5u2jar48bc63bcj@4ax.com>
<9el6529dicje1es154fju3tsrej1b7qqa5@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 58
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 21:10:15 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.56.80.235
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1146370215 70.56.80.235 (Sat, 29 Apr 2006
23:10:15 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:10:15 CDT
Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.religion.christian.baptist:801822

x-no-archive: yes

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 08:06:45 -0400, NOspam@no.spam wrote:

 copyright 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of
this article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of
the author

>On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 23:06:04 -0700, john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
>wrote:

>>On the contrary, I believe that we ARE responsible as citizens to
>>protect the public from the sociopaths.  Give you a few examples of
>>what I am talking about.
>>Charlie Manson is a sociopath, and a stone-cold blooded killer.
>>Adolph Hitler was a sociopath
>>The mass murderers (Son of Sam, Green River Killer, the Marquis De
>>Sade, this creep they just arrested who murdered an entire FAMILY so
>>he could molest the youngest daughter unimpeded)

>>all sociopaths, just like Jim Agar, like walksalone, like Elaine, like
>>Phar Lap.

>Again, O feeble-minded sloth:

>YOU ARE NOT CAPABLE OR AUTHORIZED, LET ALONE QUALIFIED TO DIAGNOSE
>ANYONE.

>>And the RESPONSIBLE Christian makes sure they are removed from
>>society.

>BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA!!!You call yourself 'responsible'?
>Fine -- then be prepared to be held accountable,

LIAR LEGION JOHNNIE

>DD WEATHERLESS!

See psycho Elaine, I can always tell when I've TOTALLY PISSED  you
off.

This " LIAR LEGION JOHNNIE DD WEATHERLESS!"

starts.

As if you actually think you're bothering me!

When in fact anyone who read it knows I just pissed you off, and
you're now stomping your feet like a 5-year old!

smirk.

We are not impressed.

john w

snip

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: Ping Elaine
Message-ID: <9md85298eu7nnqko527ojt815kvm8adlee@4ax.com>
References: <0gi0525gesi7f8rsvlckr3rq0h5f1jkl19@4ax.com>  
<h6mdnfTXia0dZc3ZnZ2dnUVZ_tSdnZ2d@comcast.com>  
<1l02525sqbkiftofrst3i3l4n3fcskcg3s@4ax.com>   <4bcn2iF10cc6kU2
@individual.net> <1146189864.767623.155800@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
<Nc2dncS2ZaENDMzZnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@comcast.com>
<8fn352phscsfrrdb1lpvk6khq6v0gkr72l@4ax.com>
<6l5452dalkq4jphkvi6q120dmu7udaq492@4ax.com>
<q7e552h3vd6mngijtspjpghkj84hdoobis@4ax.com>
<35l652hme516p9bbbdkpvlasr137f3v9mb@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 86
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 21:06:22 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.56.80.235
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1146369982 70.56.80.235 (Sat, 29 Apr 2006
23:06:22 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:06:22 CDT
Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!postnews.google.com!news3.google.com!
newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news.vic.com!
feed.news.qwest.net!news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.religion.christian.baptist:801821

x-no-archive: yes

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 07:59:08 -0400, NOspam@no.spam wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:54:39 -0700, john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
>wrote:

>>x-no-archive: yes
>>On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:20:58 -0400, NOspam@no.spam wrote:
>>>On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 02:20:56 -0700, john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
>>>wrote:

>>>>(and I highly recommend that you seek it voluntarily before you are
>>>>forced into it.)

>>>My case in point - here you are AGAIN issuing idle threats.

>>Your "case in point?"   What "idle threats?"

>>If 6 months from today, Jimmy Agar is in jail, will my remarks THEN be
>>perceived as "idle threats?"

>I wouldn't hold my breath if I was you, old boy---

ok

However, I DO recommend that YOU hold YOUR breath!

;-)

 you won't be

>putting anyone in the slammer but yourself.

For someone who OBVIOUSLY knows SO DAMN little, you sure PRETEND to
know it all!

(a pathological behavior)

>>Shut up, psycho!  You don't know anything!

>1. I will NOT shut up.

I've noticed. And your big mouth and your tiny brain may well be your
downfall YET.

>2. I know a lot more than you DARE or care to think...

choke cough.

Like you just HAD to say that to everyone!  Like, we couldn't tell by
your actions already!

smirk.

>3. Try your schoolyard bullying tricks on someone else, lazybones-- I

And you just got done telling us all what a GREAT SOH you have.

cough choke.

>do NOT intimidate easily, and frankly - your hot air just blew right
>past me.

And yours blew me over. And it was stinky.

Why does your mouth smell just like your butt?

>>john w
>liar-johnnie you were named, and rightly so.

AGAIN, psycho, you may well live to have to EAT those words in court.

And explain what about this post was a lie?

You imbecile!

john w

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!mpls-transit-01.news.qwest.net!
207.225.159.1.MISMATCH!feed.news.qwest.net!news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-
for-mail
From: john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: A prayer for both John W's
Message-ID: <ued852d94rrfkqvl91jmtkkvdt6lad0bt5@4ax.com>
References: <PoseiodonsGift-2704061646200001@192.168.0.2>
<udc152dujduf158dp5k2uo2ahp6pllpl1j@4ax.com> <PoseiodonsGift-
2804061453280001@192.168.0.2> <vp2452tlute9085bp0tdt5q9cnel43vdsc@
4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 82
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 21:01:11 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.56.80.235
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1146369671 70.56.80.235 (Sat, 29 Apr 2006
23:01:11 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:01:11 CDT
Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.religion.christian.baptist:801818

x-no-archive: yes

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:34:35 -0400, NOspam@no.spam wrote:

 copyright 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of
this article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of
the author

>On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:53:12 +1000, PoseiodonsGift@Illiad.com (Balios)
>wrote:

>>In article <udc152dujduf158dp5k2uo2ahp6pllpl1j@4ax.com>, NOspam@no.spam
wrote:

>>> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:46:20 +1000, PoseiodonsGift@Illiad.com
(Balios)
>>> wrote:

>>> deleted
>>> >In Jesus name

>>> Poseidon, I'm sorry, but to me, this is totally uncalled-for.
>>>  Those two individuals are strange, yes- but to make a mocking
>>> 'prayer' and then sign 'In Jesus name' -- you are only asking for
>>> trouble.

>>> God is NOT mocked, and especially in that way.

>>> Making jokes about a person is one thing, but to make a mockery of
>>> prayer, especially when you're an atheist, is quite another. I
>>> politely request you refrain, please.

>>I don't give a stuff

>Fine --- at least I was polite in my request.

>>It is time you Christians dealt with this problem

>I HAVE been dealing with him for some time.

And MANY of us have been dealing with you as well.

And I bet more people believe I have made more improvement than
believe YOu have.

>>It has gone on long enough

If you were not TROLLING, dirtbag demoniac, you wouldn't have to worry
about it.

The FACT that you've been foaming at the mouth over ME for 6 YEARS now
indicates that you are

1. obsessive/compulsive
2. a masochist.

Both are psychoses; get help!

(while it's still voluntary)

>>My prayer by the way is sincere

>Oh??? To wish someone to be put in dirty diapers?
>Do you really think God would approve of such a 'prayer and grant your
>request?

>>Oh and I am not an atheist

>You sure sound like one.

>>My image of God has a sense of humour - what the hell happened to yours  
-
>>Surely is is time you all got rid of the dour and lightened up.  God
gave
>>us laughter for good reason.

>I have a great SOH.

smirk. cough. choke.

>I know God does as well. But, I'm sorry- I really don't see the
>'humor' in your 'prayer.

>Have a nice day.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!mpls-transit-01.news.qwest.net!
207.225.159.1.MISMATCH!feed.news.qwest.net!news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-
for-mail
From: john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: A prayer for both John W's
Message-ID: <dbd852psmcdup90vg2db1p3f9qhtme3suk@4ax.com>
References: <PoseiodonsGift-2704061646200001@192.168.0.2>
<udc152dujduf158dp5k2uo2ahp6pllpl1j@4ax.com>
<ned252pgo1phbvq4r9fsdg18pocado193p@4ax.com>
<hcm2529tvddpfetil5udn2bsr367h0b3oi@4ax.com> <4bh8vbF11g8aiU1
@individual.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 78
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:57:50 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.56.80.235
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1146369470 70.56.80.235 (Sat, 29 Apr 2006
22:57:50 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:57:50 CDT
Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.religion.christian.baptist:801817

x-no-archive: yes
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:26:51 -0400, "Scout Lady"

<scoutlady@nospam.net> wrote:

 copyright 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of
this article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of
the author

><NOspam@no.spam> wrote in message
>news:hcm2529tvddpfetil5udn2bsr367h0b3oi@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:23:05 -0700, john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
>> wrote:

>>>x-no-archive: yes
>>>On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:59:48 -0400, NOspam@no.spam wrote:
>>> copyright 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of
>>>this article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of
>>>the author
>>>>On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:46:20 +1000, PoseiodonsGift@Illiad.com
(Balios)
>>>>wrote:

>>>>deleted
>>>>>In Jesus name

>>>>Poseidon, I'm sorry, but to me, this is totally uncalled-for.
>>>> Those two individuals are strange, yes- but to make a mocking
>>>>'prayer' and then sign 'In Jesus name' -- you are only asking for
>>>>trouble.

>>>>God is NOT mocked, and especially in that way.

>>>>Making jokes about a person is one thing, but to make a mockery of
>>>>prayer, especially when you're an atheist, is quite another. I
>>>>politely request you refrain, please.

>>>Well, Elaine comes to her senses--at least briefly.  However, to call
>>>BJ and me "strange" without acknowledging her own "strangeness" is ...

>>>chuckle.

>> No, a 'smirk' would have sufficed..........

>>>The HONEST person would have said, "Those two individuals are
>>>certainly strange, but we are ALL strange in our own way."

>> I AM honest- but I know YOU cannot realize or acknowledge this,
>> because of your own consistently abrasive behavior, and constant lies.

>>>You get .5 points, Elaine!

>>>Keep up the good work!

>> If YOU 'credited' me with .5 points, weatherless, I consider that to
>> be a minus v1200 - you're lower than low.... LIAR JOHNNIE.

>If you wish to learn and appreciate something worth while, then love to
be
>unknown and considered as nothing. Truly to know and despise self is the
>best and most perfect counsel. To think of oneself as nothing, and
always to
>think well and highly of others is the best and most perfect wisdom.
>Wherefore, if you see another sin openly or commit a serious crime, do
not
>consider yourself better, for you do not know how long you can remain in
>good estate. All men are frail, but you must admit that none is more
frail
>than yourself.
>---Imitation of Christ, book 1 chapter 2

well said. Now when do you intend to apply those wise words to
YOURSELF, Cathy?

You always seem to be pointing a finger at OTHERS while YOU seem to
consider YOURSELF above reproach!

I was taught as a child to ALWAYS apply any "advice" I wished to give
to myself FIRST.

john w

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!news.glorb.com!mpls-transit-
01.news.qwest.net!207.225.159.1.MISMATCH!feed.news.qwest.net!
news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.christian.roman-
catholic,free.christians
Subject: Re: The Great Apostasy Develops
Message-ID: <9ic8529iulafivch2o9vttc00qmevbnmva@4ax.com>
References: <yYJ4g.18458$4L1.4412@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 60
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 20:48:21 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.56.80.235
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1146368901 70.56.80.235 (Sat, 29 Apr 2006
22:48:21 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:48:21 CDT
Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.religion.christian.baptist:801812
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic:1242692 free.christians:37837

x-no-archive: yes
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:35:26 GMT, "Joe Tucker" <jtucker46@hotmail.com>
wrote:
 copyright 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of
this article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of
the author

>The Great Apostasy Develops

>ONE Lord, one faith. (Eph. 4:5) When the apostle Paul under inspiration
>penned those words (about 60-61 C.E.), there was but one Christian
faith.
>Yet, today we see a profusion of denominations, sects, and cults that
claim
>to be Christian, though they teach conflicting doctrines and hold to
>different standards of conduct. What a far cry from the one united
Christian
>congregation that started on Pentecost 33 C.E.! How did these divisions
come
>about? For the answer, we must go back to the first century of our
Common
>Era.

You have evidently FAILED to take into account the SEVERAL places
where Paul ACKNOWLEDGED sincere differences, and said, essentially,
"let each of you be convinced of his point of view, and let's all be
at peace with one another."

    RO 14:5 One man considers one day more sacred than another;
another man considers every day alike. Each one should be fully
convinced in his own mind. 6 He who regards one day as special, does
so to the Lord. He who eats meat, eats to the Lord, for he gives
thanks to God; and he who abstains, does so to the Lord and gives
thanks to God. 7 For none of us lives to himself alone and none of us
dies to himself alone. 8 If we live, we live to the Lord; and if we
die, we die to the Lord. So, whether we live or die, we belong to the
Lord.

Some were worshipping on Sunday; others INSISTED on worshipping on
Saturday.  Paul said that this should not be an issue to argue over.

And to this day, we have those who worship on Sunday, and those who
prefer to worship on Saturday.

    COL 2:16 Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or
drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration
or a Sabbath day.

By the turn of the first century, we see evidence (if you know how to
read the Bible with ANY perception), of half-a-dozen different
"denominations", all peacefully co-existing.

You are preaching to the wrong crowd, fella!

And before you can PREACH the Bible, you need to know it!

You obviously do not!

john w

snipped

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!mpls-transit-01.news.qwest.net!
207.225.159.1.MISMATCH!feed.news.qwest.net!news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-
for-mail
From: john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.christian.roman-
catholic,free.christians
Subject: Re: The Paradox of Tertullian
Message-ID: <dvr6521msrpmp0t91pq0tsd8asj291u4ts@4ax.com>
References: <k5h3525jpqo6a6tnq82f24g8nma28biiej@4ax.com>      
<4be2umF1113k7U1@individual.net>       <jpn4g.948374$xm3.110511
@attbi_s21>       <qn4452d1lcetns1eqc0le5q1h1q9fsiggq@4ax.com>      
<44521f73$1$jnyxfnybar$mr2ice@news.individual.net>      
<1146233997.039578.197590@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>      
<8785521dvjn67ju014hc6tf7nk2e2giccd@4ax.com> <4452a99b$2$jnyxfnybar
$mr2ice@news.individual.net> <4bfv0tFvl0ccU1@individual.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 38
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 06:56:18 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.56.80.235
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1146318978 70.56.80.235 (Sat, 29 Apr 2006
08:56:18 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 08:56:18 CDT
Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.religion.christian.baptist:801542
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic:1242333 free.christians:37730

x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:49:16 -0400, "Robibnikoff"

<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:

 copyright 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of
this article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of
the author

><walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.dirt.cheap.llc>

>snip

>> You make the claim, yet there are those with more reason to act like
you
>> do, that don't. Your claimed bi-polar, doesn't fit your conduct here.
As
>> to the sexual abuse claim, I give it the same credit I gave your claim
to
>> having gotten laid at the age of four. But when you finally tried to
>> defend your story, you acted as if it was a rape by an older woman,
what
>> was she again, 5?

Once again, in someone's (can't find this original post) attempt to
discredit me (yet again), facts have been HORRIBLY garbled.

Here's a clue, STUPID:  sex play between / among children of the same
approximate age (me 4 / her 5; me 5 /her 4) is one thing, and it's
innocent.

Forced sex between a boy of 8 and two teens of 13 and 15 is a
completely different matter, and I don't see anything funny about it.

john w

Deliberately I would guess.

john w

>WHAT?!?!?  Oh my, this is one I haven't heard.  Deary me, sounds sordid.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Path: uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!mpls-transit-01.news.qwest.net!
207.225.159.1.MISMATCH!feed.news.qwest.net!news.uswest.net.POSTED!not-
for-mail
From: john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.christian.roman-
catholic,free.christians
Subject: Re: The Paradox of Tertullian
Message-ID: <n6s6521ja72sfa647kue6tske7ufoaisv3@4ax.com>
References: <9O24g.20909$tN3.4622@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>
<p6g152t5vphu3vr695njge6a30mm0vsm68@4ax.com> <Icb4g.64614$F_3.34089
@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>
<NNSdnW0dNvwp3czZnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@comcast.com>
<k5h3525jpqo6a6tnq82f24g8nma28biiej@4ax.com> <4be2umF1113k7U1
@individual.net> <jpn4g.948374$xm3.110511@attbi_s21>
<qn4452d1lcetns1eqc0le5q1h1q9fsiggq@4ax.com> <4bejr7F10ub9eU1
@individual.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0617-3, 04/28/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 119
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 07:06:08 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.56.80.235
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 1146319569 70.56.80.235 (Sat, 29 Apr 2006
09:06:09 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:06:09 CDT
Xref: uni-berlin.de alt.religion.christian.baptist:801545
alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic:1242343 free.christians:37734

x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:34:56 -0400, "Robibnikoff"

<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:

 copyright 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of
this article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of
the author

>"john w @yoo.hoo>" <johnw<no_spam> wrote in message
>news:qn4452d1lcetns1eqc0le5q1h1q9fsiggq@4ax.com...
>> x-no-archive: yes
>> On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:56:03 GMT, "Alan" <Me@here.com> wrote:
>> copyright 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of
>> this article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of
>> the author

>>>"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
>>>news:4be2umF1113k7U1@individual.net...

>>>> "john w @yoo.hoo>" <johnw<no_spam> wrote in message
>>>> news:k5h3525jpqo6a6tnq82f24g8nma28biiej@4ax.com...
>>>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>>> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:07:48 -0500, "H.E. Eickleberry, Jr."
>>>>> <Xeickleberrybooks@comcast.net> wrote:

>>>>>>LOL

>>>>>>It must be the JW mantra: Whatever God says, teach the opposite.

>>>>> You need to spell out "Jehovah's Witness" here, ike. Some will
think
>>>>> you are referring to me, John Weatherly.

>>>> Goodness knows, it'a always ALL ABOUT YOU, jw.

>>>Hope you enjoyed yourself Robyn, it was a cheap shot.  JW had a
legitimate
>>>request.

>> Thanks, Alan.