Source: Page 148 of White Noise Keywords: "shows," "you've," "read," "little"

From: "Chadwick Stone©" <chad_stone@127.0.0.1> Subject: Teh SOVEREIGN LITS'0'LIES {Was: A Note to Ignoramuses: Here's How It Works.} Date: 14 Aug 2006 Newsgroups: alt.fan.art-bell

Raymond Karczewski walked teh way of teh k0oK and lied: 44dfc3e7.41735...@news.west.earthlink.net > A Note to Ignoramuses: Here's How It Works. Since when does the architect of a seven felonly rap sheet know how anything works... other than criminal enterprises? > By: Raymond Ronald Karczewski The (not your) copyright symbol was redacted, your name isn't copyrighted. By the way, have convinced my neighbor to name one of her puppies, Raymond Ronald Karczewski (also not copyrighted at this time) and to apply to various pet product venues to use the animal as a spokesdog/mascot. If *THAT* happens, it's name will become a registered trademark owned by my neighbor and contracted to commercial venues for profit <snicker> And you won't ever collect a cent... Hell, isn't it? > I, like any of you write an original article. No, like *SOME* others, you lie, threaten, stalk, harass, attack, and spam. > I communicate Truth. Liar. The truth isn't in you, convict. Your pathological lies have been extensively documented and presented to you by tireless agents assigned to all of the forums and newsgroups you spam. Some lies of note include (but are not limited to:) 1. Teh liengate II scandal aka Postie's lien. Neither you nor Jamie appear in any UCC lien filings in Arkansas. Records were researched back to 1996. 2. Teh welfaregate scandal aka your alleged "retirement pension" which civil servants do not get after six years on the beat. 3. Teh lawschoolgate scandal aka your unsubstantiated claim of law school attendance. You have a two year degree in liberal arts from some community college not the prerequisite undergraduate degree required for application to a legitmately accredited law school. Your present educational credential is by definition, proof that you never attended law school. 4. Teh cowboygate scandal where you claimed that a police issue revolver was the appropriate weapon to use 30 meters from a man holding a gun to an innocent bystander who was doubled as a human shield. 5. Teh corpsegate scandal where you claim by inferrence to love your corpsewife, yet abandoned her to the elements because it was more important for you to fight city hall and risk incarceration to embark upon a felony crime spree rather than stay home and take care of her as she lay gasping for air. 6. Teh felonygate scandal (aka liengate I) where you deny that you are a convicted felon. It says on your own k0oKshite that you were convicted of those crimes. 7. Teh copyrightgate scandal whereby you claim that anyone who reproduces "Raymond Ronald Karczewski" (as I just did) owes you $500,000 for unauthorized use of your k0oKy moniker. Where's my lien? If someone owed me half a million dollars, I would be down at the courthouse drawing up papers this very moment; why aren't you? 8. Teh sovereigntygate scandal where you claim that you are not subject to the law because you voided your 14th Amendment status. If that were true, then what you actually did was rescind your U.S. citizenship. Since you have neither been detained by ICE nor deported, your assertion is proven a lie. 9. Teh licensegate scandal where you assert that you are not required to be licensed to drive. You in fact, *ARE* when you drive on tax-payer subsidized roads because you are required to comply with all laws regulation the use of said roads. 10. Teh boycottgate scandal where you claim to boycott government; yet you constantly and consistently stalk and harass everyone from sheriff's deputies to the governor of Oregon to Bush Jr. demanding government action. You live on a government check (aka your welfare hand-out). You receive government medical care. Your corpsewife receives government paid medical care and registers your vehicles with the government. Neither one of you boycott the government. That is a mere TEN of your lies; you pathological liar. > Truth is not usually perceivable by dulled Intellects full of confused > opposing ideas. Which is why you mistakenly believe that you are a man of truth. You are neither manly nor are you truthful. > You read my article for whatever motive you may have. I seek a cheap laugh which you provide free of charge. > There you will be introduced to you own true level of Intelligence, > like it or not. My own true level of intelligence is generally offended by the obscene lack of intelligence found within your illucid spam. Occasionally, you invent a new insult which merits a chuckle or two... "dithered demonic dunce" was a good one, why don't you get back to basics and generate a some new ones? > Some may understand my writings. Only the mentally ill who in their schizophrenic codependent delusions are able to reassemble your word salad into something that appears coherent, but then, what appears coherent to someone who is mentally ill isn't coherent at all to one disposed of a balanced, rational mindset. > Most will not understand my writings unless they are true seekers of > Truth. Present quantified, peer-reviewed evidence for that outrageous assertion. Because you said so is neither quantified nor peer-reviewed. > The Truth of my articles will resonate in your own being when you > hear or read it as the same Truth exists in us all. You are only > recognizing what is in you, not another. > Unfortunately ignoramuses and stupid people have too much > intellectual garbage cluttering up their consciousness that they > cannot see simple Truth when it is right under their noses. You certainly do throw about a lot of ad hominems for someone who claims not to use ad hominems. Make that lie number 11 for teh SOVEREIGN LITS'0'LIES. > These ignorant and stupid people have a myriad of pat,compensatory > reactions to avoid facing their own ignorance. "Repetition is a sign of ignorance" - Raymond Ronald Karczewski Pssst... don't forget to claim that was another $500,000, ya big fat liar. > Most lash out with accusations that the author is crazy or has > ulterior motives for writing in ways their intellects cannot grasp. You *DO* have ulterior motives; you are hawking commercial (albeit shoddily done) products via a shoddily done commercial website. > Pssst: That's a dead giveaway of Ignorance. Unless it's true. You are crazy. In my opinion, you are one of the sickest, most mentally ill individuals polluting afa-b today. Hopefully, your brother Abraham will succeed in obtaining the involuntary committment to the state hospital in Salem where you can get the treatment and therapy you so desperately require. You want to blame the so-called afa-b bullies for your problems, when in fact, you intruded upon afa-b and brought the detraction you receive, upon yourself. If there was an honest bone in your body, you would crosspost your inane babble to alt.usenet.kooks, alt.troll, and alt.flame. In light of your past racist remarks and diatribes, perhaps you should consider afn in your spam distribution, as well. > They never see their incapacity to they must blame the author. Just as you blamed Widdy for pointing out your lies and hypocrisies in his followup to your silly spampost. > Simple Solution: If you find yourself on the horns of that dilemna, > don't torture your miniscule intellect, don't read what you don't > understand. You're not ready for it. Now, wasn't that simple? Translation: Don't try to understand the convoluted product of a disturbed mind if you aren't as disturbed and delusional as the messiah wannabe who spammed it. > As a preliminary exercise to determine whether the problem exists in > the author or the reader, check all responses to the article and count > the number of lines (usually they are less than three) lashing out at > the author. Translation: Witty comments burn your ass because your untalented prose lacks such wit. Free hint, convict: You're a hack, you cannot write, you shouldn't even try without first passing an elementary grammar course. > Hint, hint: already you must see the bereftness of > intelligence in such pitiful demand for answers when the cup asking to > be filled is not capable of expressing more than three sentences at a > given time. Wait a minute, there's a classic contradiction in essence. You claim that words are a satanic medium... by that logic, the fewer words they use, the less satanic they are. You now claim that not using enough words is ignorant. If the ignorant and the satanic run hand in hand then you have yourself quite the catch-22 there. There is a simpler solution. Ockham's razor says you're full of shit. > I don't pander to fools, ignoramuses, and certainly not to stupid > people. Liar. You *CLAIM* that you write what you write to wake up such sleepyheaded ignoramuses. That is pandering and you're a liar... as usual. > I will never engage in a dialogue [...] 'nuff said. > If you want an answer from me, you must share with me and the rest > of the readers YOU OWN GRASP of what you find objectionable or DO not > understand. It's been done, you still ran for cover seeing your own hypocrisy exposed. > Cheap shot one to three liners, just won't do it, despite > the choir of IGNORAMUSES egging you on. No person responds to you because another person eggs it on, except of course for the occasional sockpuppet that you manufacture as a tool of fraudulent commiseration e.g. rudolph underwood, citizen-x, o (those last two being your corpsewife, but everyone knows she is just your corpsepuppet) I'm starting to suspect she isn't really alive, she looks so much like a cadaver. The folks at the office of social security and welfare ought to pay a little visit to see what's what and who is still alive. > When your own ignorance is thus mirrored If you mirror ignorance, then that makes you a conduit of ignorance. Just one more flaw in that verbal gimmick, convict. > back to to you, you must be > man enough to rise about your pettiness and get on with the dialogue, > or don't read any further. The irony of anyone who refused to eat until you were ill, stating that anyone *ELSE* should act like a man, is so thick you can cut it with a knife. > I have been writing for 10 years on the Internet. Correction: You have been spamming, harassing, trolling, stalking, threatening, and embarrassing yourself, your family, and the entire nation of Poland for 10 years on the Internet. I have friends in Poland you asshole; you make a mockery of them every time you sign your name to that two-bit talentless spam you foist upon decent society. > Most of what I have written IS LIFE CHANGING TO THE MAX Or SUPER-MAX depending on how far into your criminal enterprise they are willing to venture. You are on record as wanting to harm government officials and the government in general. >, and may be found on my > links: http://www.ark <snip> and > http://www.ark <snip> Links to commercial k0oKshite redacted. > You may also type my name in google and knock yourself out. Yeah, be sure to add words such as "morphine" and "mannequin" that search string. > However, you will not get a response from me just because I > contribute to this newsgroup/forum That is because you are a big fat coward who fears confrontation with those who mirror your lies, hypocrisy, and cowardice. Hell, isn't it? > because you are too damned lazy to seek truth beyond the "silver platter stage." Speaking of "too damned lazy," you've been unemployed for what... 30 years now. When are you going to get up off your 350 pound fat ass and get a job? > My offerings are for the Spiritual, not the Spiritually Challenged. There is that same contradiction in essence again. So you are NOT writing to wake up sheople, huh? Strange, in the past, that is exactly who you have asserted your target audience is. You're a liar, convict. A pathological liar. > They must deal with their own hangups honestly and courageously before > they will get a peep out of me. Heal thyself, hypocrite. Lead by example; spend a few years in Salem patching your own mind together before making similar recommendations to others. Decades of marching beneath a largely rejected, tattered banner has left you just as tattered as the banner which represents your k0oKy cult. > Quite frankly, the evidence by the link responses to my articles > shows that the whole of your numbers which make up the repeat posters > of this forum, combined together couldn't make up a single holistic > simple man of Truth in clarity of consciousness. And you are right here in the thick of it. In case you just missed it, you just shot yourself in the foot with an irony bullet, convict. > If you don't like it -- lump it!! Right back atcha, you sick freak. > Then return worshipping your Satanic Myths which have > screwed you up so. > Raymond Ronald Karczewski Liar, your name is not copyrighted. > *********************************************************** > FOOLPROOF [...] Irony noted. > August 13 2006: DAY 559 How many people have joined your boyk0oK, convict? You've had 559 days to recruit followers, what are your numbers? <crickets> > JOIN NATIONAL CORPORATE CONSUMERS BOYCOTT ALREADY IN > PROGRESS. Still boycotting by pumping your welfare dollars into Sony and BMG's pocket, convict? -- COOSN-266-06-70683 Skepticult® Member# 581-00504-208 HoT, March 2005 BWMDW, Trainer of pSylvia pSullivan Usenet's most helpful netizen ChadwickStone at Gmail dot com

Back to "The Usenet Project" Main Page - Back to Starve.Org Main Page - Contact - Starve Archive